CommonQuant
CommonQuant.ai Research
AI-generated trading idea · NEUTRAL · AMD, BSX, COP, CVX, GE, ORCL, QCOM, TME, XOM, XPEV

## Session overview QCOM led the after-midnight gainers, rising about 4.25%, followed by COP up roughly 3.33%, CVX higher by around 2.64%, XOM gaining approximately 2.57%, and AMD adding about 2.19%. On the downside, XPEV dropped about 4.48%, with GE lowe

## Session overview QCOM led the after-midnight gainers, rising about 4.25%, followed by COP up roughly 3.33%, CVX higher by around 2.64%, XOM gaining approximately 2.57%, and AMD adding about 2.19%. On the downside, XPEV dropped about 4.48%, with GE lower by roughly 3.31%, ORCL down approximately 3.07%, TME slipping about 2.71%, and BSX easing roughly 2.62%. ## Compared with previous session The prior night's edition was led by gainers BSX up about 4.82% and CRM up roughly 4.73%, while LRCX dropped about 8.29% and INTC fell roughly 5.59%. This session's tape flipped leadership toward QCOM at approximately 4.25% and energy names like COP and CVX, while former leader BSX reversed into the loser column with a roughly 2.62% decline. ## Gainers - **QCOM +4.25%** — Qualcomm climbed roughly 4.25

Idea

## Session overview QCOM led the after-midnight gainers, rising about 4.25%, followed by COP up roughly 3.33%, CVX higher by around 2.64%, XOM gaining approximately 2.57%, and AMD adding about 2.19%. On the downside, XPEV dropped about 4.48%, with GE lower by roughly 3.31%, ORCL down approximately 3.07%, TME slipping about 2.71%, and BSX easing roughly 2.62%. ## Compared with previous session The prior night's edition was led by gainers BSX up about 4.82% and CRM up roughly 4.73%, while LRCX dropped about 8.29% and INTC fell roughly 5.59%. This session's tape flipped leadership toward QCOM at approximately 4.25% and energy names like COP and CVX, while former leader BSX reversed into the loser column with a roughly 2.62% decline. ## Gainers - **QCOM +4.25%** — Qualcomm climbed roughly 4.25

Advanced Analysis — institutional-depth research report

Verdict: one dial from armed — but wait for the cross

This is a rules-based long system across five large caps (QCOM, AMD, COP, CVX, XOM), and its completed 60-month backtest on QCOM daily bars returned 74.7% over just three trades with a 100% win rate against a 20.4% maximum drawdown — encouraging, but three trades is not statistical proof, and exits were filled on daily bars. The fundamentals beneath the book are genuinely mixed: AMD's net margin jumped from 13.5% to 19.9% in Q2 2026 and QCOM generated $12.8B of free cash flow, yet QCOM's Q3 2026 net margin collapsed 49.4 points to 20.1% and CVX revenue fell 4.6% year over year. Ownership data adds caution — filed disclosures for the period ended June 30, 2026 show net open-market insider selling of $167.5M at AMD and $147.3M at Chevron. Today the right posture is patience: QCOM's RSI sits at 39.3, only 0.7 points from the 40 cross that arms the entry, and price already holds above the 200-day EMA, so one modest up-session could do it — but until it does, nothing is live. We rate trade readiness lower than thesis support for that reason, and we would flip to actionable on a confirmed daily RSI cross above 40 with MACD still positive.

Conviction score breakdownComposite score computed by the server from the applicable evidence-tier dimensions.
MeasureValue
Thesis support65/100
Trade readiness35/100
Risk quality60/100
Backtest evidence55/100
Fundamentals trend60/100
Score55/100
Composite Score55/100
Evidence Tierbacktested
Decision scenariosBull, base, and bear cases synthesized from the cited evidence tier. Likelihoods are rounded evidence-weighted judgments, not statistically calibrated forecasts.
MeasureValue
Evidence Tierbacktested

Trade now: One dial away — wait for QCOM's RSI to cross 40

This is a five-name long setup (QCOM, AMD, COP, CVX, XOM) that only trades when its entry rules are live, and today none of them are. QCOM is the closest: the idea's second entry rule needs the daily close above the 200-day EMA (met, price at $187.8 versus the EMA at roughly $175), the MACD line above its signal (met), and the RSI (14) crossing above 40. The RSI reads 39.3 — just 0.7 points from the trigger. Until that cross prints on a daily bar, the concrete instruction is **wait**: do not pre-position. The completed backtest behind this idea is on QCOM daily bars: over 60 months it returned 74.7% on 3 trades with a 100% win rate and a 20.4% maximum drawdown; over the last 12 months it returned 33.3% with about a 4.0% drawdown. Once an entry triggers, the risk mechanics are explicit. The stop is a 2.5% loss from entry; the take-profit is a 5.0% gain, which is an effective reward:risk of about 2.0-to-1. Position sizing is fixed-risk (roughly 2.5% of equity per trade) with a 20% maximum position weight, and any position is force-closed after 30 bars if neither stop nor target is hit. A fiber-extension profit level (127.2%) can also close the trade early on strength. The other candidates are further from triggering. COP meets its trend and MACD conditions (price $141.22 versus EMA near $123) but its RSI is 33.7, about 6.3 points below the 40 cross, and the first rule additionally requires a daily low touching the nearest support. CVX has already run — RSI 72.6 — so the momentum-cross condition is behind it, not ahead. AMD, GE, ORCL, BSX, TME and XPEV fail the trend condition outright (price below the 200-day EMA), so no entry there today regardless of momentum. Note that the parameter-sensitivity pass ran out of time budget, so no alternative parameter setup was recommended; you trade the published rules as-is. Bottom line: the actionable state is a standing order mentality, not a market order. Watch QCOM's daily RSI; a cross above 40 while price holds above the EMA and MACD stays positive arms the highest-priority live setup, with the 2.5% stop and 5.0% target defined before you click.

AMD price and trigger mapUses the idea timeframe and keeps price levels on the price axis.
MeasureValue
TickerAMD
Timeframe1h
BSX price and trigger mapUses the idea timeframe and keeps price levels on the price axis.
MeasureValue
TickerBSX
Timeframe1h
COP price and trigger mapUses the idea timeframe and keeps price levels on the price axis.
MeasureValue
TickerCOP
Timeframe1h

Five Trend Leaders, A Backtest That Actually Traded

This idea is not a narrative bet on one stock — it is a rules-based long system across five large-cap leaders (Qualcomm, AMD, ConocoPhillips, Chevron, Exxon Mobil), and its completed backtest is genuinely encouraging: over a 60-month daily window the strategy returned 74.7% with a 100% win rate across 3 trades, against a worst peak-to-trough drawdown of 20.4%. The recent session context aligns with that tilt: Qualcomm led gainers up about 4.25%, while COP, CVX, and XOM all rose roughly 2.6% to 3.3%, per the session recap — and a Yahoo Finance piece on the smartphone chip rally specifically flags Qualcomm climbing around 4% alongside Skyworks and Qorvo. The fundamentals underneath the covered names support a long bias in this cohort. AMD grew revenue 34.3% year over year to $34.6B with gross margin now at 49.5% and rising quarter over quarter (+0.95 points to 53.8% in Q2 2026); its net margin jumped from 13.5% to 19.9% in a single quarter. The Bloomberg-sourced theme "AMD Is Eating Intel's Lunch" fits that trajectory. Qualcomm posted 13.7% revenue growth with a 27.9% operating margin and $12.8B of free cash flow, ranking near the top of its IT peer group on both cash generation and profitability. The energy side of the book is not dead weight either. ConocoPhillips has raised its dividend for years (trailing twelve months of $3.36 per share, up from $0.78 quarterly tiers through 2026), Chevron's Q2 2026 net margin rebounded to 18.0% from 4.6% the prior quarter, and ExxonMobil generated $23.6B of free cash flow in FY2025. A cited Yahoo Finance piece has Chevron's CEO betting $7 billion that the world is out of spare oil capacity — a supply-tightness thesis consistent with holding CVX and COP long. On the evidence tier: this is a backtested, completed setup. In the most recent 12-month window the same rules produced a 33.3% return with a maximum drawdown of only 4.0%, so the short-run performance is not solely a relic of the 2021-2024 tech recovery. Entry conditions combine a long-term trend filter (price above the 200-day average), momentum confirmation, and support-level timing, with a fixed 2.5% stop and 5% profit target per position — a disciplined asymmetry that suits these liquid mega-caps. One honest caveat on setup selection: the parameter-sensitivity evaluation did not complete, so no robust nearby-parameter setup was established; the results reflect the published configuration as-is, with exits filled on daily bars rather than intraday data.

XPEV RevenueRevenue trend from CommonQuant fundamentals/XBRL data; +790336.2% from first to latest point.
MeasureValue
2018-12-31$9706000
2019-12-31$2321219000
2020-12-31$895681000
2021-12-31$20988131000
2022-12-31$26855119000
2023-12-31$30676067000
2024-12-31$40866309000
2025-12-31$76719742000
Latest Value$76719742000
Change Pct$790336.2456212651
TickerXPEV
Timeframereported periods
TME Return on equityReturn on equity trend from CommonQuant fundamentals/XBRL data; +2363.6% from first to latest point.
MeasureValue
2016-12-310.003974023456431133%
2017-12-310.05072491488466394%
2018-12-310.0485936215900957%
2019-12-310.0913512273457215%
2020-12-310.07952914154464542%
2021-12-310.060198342508496136%
2022-12-310.07644649576914281%
2023-12-310.08800329117999535%
2024-12-310.09790312836155196%
Latest Value0.09790312836155196%
Change Pct2363.577012941784%
TickerTME
Timeframereported periods
AMD sector percentile checkRanks AMD against 791 companies in its sector using CommonQuant fundamentals.
MeasureValue
Free cash flow99.1150442477876th percentile
Revenue growth (YoY)77.53807106598984th percentile
Operating margin76.93208430913349th percentile
Rnd Intensity67.29377713458756th percentile
TickerAMD
SectorInformation Technology
Peer Count791

Three Trades, One Name, and a 20% Drawdown Hiding in the Equity Curve

Start with the sample size. The headline 74.7% return and 100% win rate come from exactly three trades over five years, and the equity curve shows the strategy sat flat for long stretches (including all of the last year before two late entries). A 100% win rate on three trades is not statistically meaningful — one adverse gap through the 2.5% stop, which daily-bar fills approximate rather than guarantee, would rewrite the record. The disclosed exit fidelity warning matters here: stops and targets were filled on trigger-timeframe bars, not intraday prices, so the win rate is coarse and may flatter results. The 20.4% maximum drawdown is the number to internalize. This system can give back a fifth of its equity in a losing stretch, and QCOM is the sole traded symbol across every evaluated window — so despite five covered tickers, realized performance hinges on one semiconductor name. Qualcomm's own fundamentals show why concentration is risky: its Q3 2026 net margin collapsed to 20.1% from 69.5% the prior quarter (a 49.4-point swing), and operating margin fell 5.4 points. The prior session's tape also flipped against the tech side of this book — BSX reversed from +4.8% leadership into a roughly 2.6% decline, and ORCL sank about 3.1% after earnings per the cited Yahoo Finance piece asking whether Oracle stock is a buy after the drop. Insider behavior cuts against the long thesis in the two largest positions. Filed disclosures for the period ended June 30, 2026 show net open-market selling of $167.5 million at AMD across 18 holders and $147.3 million at Chevron across 22 holders — the people closest to both books were net sellers into this setup. AMD's growth story also has a cost side: free cash flow in Q2 2026 ($1.56B) fell below Q1's $2.57B even as margins rose, and shares outstanding ticked up. The energy leg has its own cracks. Chevron's revenue declined 4.6% year over year and EPS fell roughly 32%, and Exxon's net margin compressed from 7.9% to 4.9% in its most recent quarter — a nearly 3-point deterioration into the idea's publication window. Finally, the parameter-sensitivity evaluation ran out of budget, so no robust setup was established beyond the published one; there is no evidence that nearby parameter choices would behave similarly. If the trend regime that produced those three winners breaks, the fixed 2.5% stop helps, but a 20% portfolio drawdown remains a realistic bad case, and leadership rotation — already visible in this session's flip from BSX to energy and chips — is exactly the kind of regime change that produces it.

Backtested stress-test readShows the backtested sample behind the bear-case risk discussion.
MeasureValue
Return74.73604240386324%
Win rate100%
Max drawdown20.41893143791989%
Trades3 count
Timeframe60 months

Company context

### AMD **Ownership and insiders.** For the period ending 2026-06-30, 18 reporting holders were counted holding 8875837 reported shares. Insider filings indicate net open-market selling, netting US$-167492712.09. Coverage: Deadline Passed. **Management.** Dr. Lisa T. Su Ph.D. is identified as chief executive. Dr. Lisa T. Su Ph.D. is listed as Chair, President & CEO, with reported total pay of US$4.5M for fiscal 2025. Source: [Yahoo Finance quoteSummary](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AMD/profile), retrieved 2026-09-16T04:07:14.26+00:00. **Dividends.** The provider's ten-year corporate-action history contains no cash dividend payments. Source: [Yahoo Finance corporate actions](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AMD/history?filter=div), retrieved 2026-09-16T04:07:14.26+00:00. **Fundamental changes.** Latest reported comparisons: - Gross margin: 53.7% for Q2 ending 2026-06-27 versus 52.8% for Q1 ending 2026-03-28 (+0.9 percentage points) · quarter over quarter - Net margin: 19.9% for Q2 ending 2026-06-27 versus 13.4% for Q1 ending 2026-03-28 (+6.4 percentage points) · quarter over quarter - Operating margin: 17.2% for Q2 ending 2026-06-27 versus 14.3% for Q1 ending 2026-03-28 (+2.9 percentage points) · quarter over quarter - Return on equity: 3.4% for Q2 ending 2026-06-27 versus 2.1% for Q1 ending 2026-03-28 (+1.3 percentage points) · quarter over quarter - Shares Outstanding: 1.6B shares for Q2 ending 2026-06-27 versus 1.6B shares for Q1 ending 2026-03-28 (+0.1%) · quarter over quarter Source: Reported company financial data. Comparisons use consecutive reported periods at the same cadence and compatible units. Relative percentage changes require a positive baseline; rate changes are expressed in percentage points. **Unavailable comparisons.** - Debt to equity: The latest period's value is unavailable. - Free cash flow: The statement currency is unavailable or uses an unsupported unit. - Net Income: The statement currency is unavailable or uses an unsupported unit. - Operating Cash Flow: The statement currency is unavailable or uses an unsupported unit. - Revenue: The statement currency is unavailable or uses an unsupported unit. ### BSX **Ownership and insiders.** For the period ending 2026-06-30, 8 reporting holders were counted holding 12393865 reported shares. Insider filings indicate net open-market buying, netting US$10040038.08. Coverage: Deadline Passed. **Management.** Mr. Michael F. Mahoney…

Scores

  • Conviction score breakdown: 55
  • Thesis support: 65
  • Trade readiness: 35
  • Risk quality: 60
  • Backtest evidence: 55
  • Fundamentals trend: 60

Watch items

  • QCOM — RSI (14), daily
  • QCOM — Price vs 200-day EMA
  • COP — RSI (14), daily
  • COP — Daily low vs nearest support
  • CVX — RSI (14), daily
  • AMD — Price vs 200-day EMA
  • QCOM — Insider net open-market activity
Unlock full analysis — 100 credits

Key details

AMDBSXCOPCVXGEORCLQCOMTMEXOMXPEV1h#canonical-demand#cluster-version:1#direction:neutral#entity-kind:instrument#entity:AMD#entity:BSX#entity:COP#entity:CVX#entity:GE#entity:ORCL#entity:QCOM#entity:TME#entity:XOM#entity:XPEV#horizon:short_term#intent:research#symbol:AMD#symbol:BSX#symbol:COP#symbol:CVX#symbol:GE#symbol:ORCL#symbol:QCOM#symbol:TME#symbol:XOM#symbol:XPEV

Community

1
Upvotes
0
Views
0
Copies
0
Cosigns

News sources

Related