CommonQuant
CommonQuant.ai Research
AI-generated trading idea · NEUTRAL · AAPL, ACN, ADBE, AMD, INTC, JD, LRCX, MSFT, ORCL, TSLA

## Session overview Lam Research led the after-midnight gainers, rising about 5.12%, followed by AMD up roughly 4.69%, Intel higher by around 4.51%, Oracle up approximately 3.08%, and JD gaining about 1.87%. On the downside, Adobe dropped about 6.73%, wit

## Session overview Lam Research led the after-midnight gainers, rising about 5.12%, followed by AMD up roughly 4.69%, Intel higher by around 4.51%, Oracle up approximately 3.08%, and JD gaining about 1.87%. On the downside, Adobe dropped about 6.73%, with Tesla off roughly 5.92%, Accenture lower by around 3.31%, Apple down approximately 2.51%, and Microsoft slipping about 2.04%. ## Compared with previous session The prior night's edition was led by Oracle up about 5.69% and Tesla up roughly 5.42%, with Accenture among the gainers at about 2.90%. This session, Oracle and AMD again traded higher, but Tesla and Accenture flipped to the loser column, with Tesla down about 5.92% and Accenture off roughly 3.31%. ## Gainers - **LRCX +5.12%** — No matching ingested catalyst was found for LRCX. Th

Idea

## Session overview Lam Research led the after-midnight gainers, rising about 5.12%, followed by AMD up roughly 4.69%, Intel higher by around 4.51%, Oracle up approximately 3.08%, and JD gaining about 1.87%. On the downside, Adobe dropped about 6.73%, with Tesla off roughly 5.92%, Accenture lower by around 3.31%, Apple down approximately 2.51%, and Microsoft slipping about 2.04%. ## Compared with previous session The prior night's edition was led by Oracle up about 5.69% and Tesla up roughly 5.42%, with Accenture among the gainers at about 2.90%. This session, Oracle and AMD again traded higher, but Tesla and Accenture flipped to the loser column, with Tesla down about 5.92% and Accenture off roughly 3.31%. ## Gainers - **LRCX +5.12%** — No matching ingested catalyst was found for LRCX. Th

Advanced Analysis — institutional-depth research report

Verdict: LRCX's setup is credible but the entry is not live — wait for the crossover

The strongest case for this trade is fundamental: Lam Research's fiscal year ended June 28, 2026 shows revenue of $23.2B, up 26.0% year over year, with a 58.3% return on equity and an operating margin of 35.3% sitting at the 97th percentile of its Information Technology peer group — and the quarterly dividend was lifted to $0.26 a share with the June 17, 2026 payment. The strongest case against is that insiders were net open-market sellers of roughly $58.3M in the ownership period ended June 30, 2026 (a filed figure from that past window, not a current-day signal), and the latest reported quarter's revenue of $6.7B was down about 71% from the prior quarter per SEC XBRL data. Technically, the setup is two of four conditions live — RSI (14) at 33.4 and ADX (14) at 39.0 both pass, but price at 322.6 still needs about a 2.4% push above the 21-period EMA at 330.4 on the 1-hour read — and nothing is triggered yet. The completed 60-month backtest is thin: two trades, both winners, roughly +90.5% cumulative return with zero realized drawdown, and no robust nearby-parameter setup was established in the sensitivity review, so the published thresholds should be used as written. That combination says wait for confirmation rather than pre-position. What would change the call is a daily close above the 21-period EMA while RSI stays at or below 45 and ADX holds above 20.

Conviction score breakdownComposite score computed by the server from the applicable evidence-tier dimensions.
MeasureValue
Thesis support65/100
Trade readiness40/100
Risk quality55/100
Backtest evidence35/100
Fundamentals trend75/100
Score54/100
Composite Score54/100
Evidence Tierbacktested
Decision scenariosBull, base, and bear cases synthesized from the cited evidence tier. Likelihoods are rounded evidence-weighted judgments, not statistically calibrated forecasts.
MeasureValue
Evidence Tierbacktested

Trade now

## Trade now **LRCX (1h) is close to its entry setup, but not there yet.** The EMA/RSI/ADX Crossover Long needs four things at once: a close crossing above the 21-period EMA, RSI (14) at or below 45, price above that EMA, and ADX (14) above 20. Right now two of four are live — RSI (14) is 33.4 (trigger: at or below 45, met) and ADX (14) is 39.0 (trigger: above 20, met). Price is 322.6 versus the EMA (21) at 330.4, so the crossover and above-EMA conditions still need roughly a 2.4% push. "Wait" means sitting flat until those price conditions flip on the daily chart the strategy trades — do not pre-position. If triggered near current levels, the exit ladder is explicit: a take-profit zone near the 326.57 resistance level or a fixed +5.1% gain, against a stop at a close below the 313.1 support level or a fixed -2.5% loss. From an entry near 322.6, the fixed loss/profit brackets give an effective reward:risk of about 2:1; the level-based pair alone (326.57 target vs. 313.1 stop) is closer to 0.4:1, so the fixed brackets would do most of the risk control work. On evidence: the completed 60-month backtest on LRCX daily bars produced 2 trades, both winners, +0.90% total return and zero realized drawdown — a thin trade sample, so treat the setup as an entry-discipline tool rather than a high-frequency edge. Note that the parameter-sensitivity review completed with no robust nearby-parameter setup established, so the published thresholds are the thesis-consistent ones and should be used as written.

AAPL price and trigger mapUses the idea timeframe and keeps price levels on the price axis.
MeasureValue
TickerAAPL
Timeframe1h
ACN price and trigger mapUses the idea timeframe and keeps price levels on the price axis.
MeasureValue
TickerACN
Timeframe1h
ADBE price and trigger mapUses the idea timeframe and keeps price levels on the price axis.
MeasureValue
TickerADBE
Timeframe1h

The Chip Complex Is Carrying the Tape — and the Money Is Following

The session itself is the thesis. Lam Research led the board up about 5.12%, with AMD up roughly 4.69%, Intel around 4.51%, Oracle near 3.08%, and JD about 1.87% — a gainers' list dominated by semiconductors and AI-adjacent names. That breadth is echoed in the cited news: Bloomberg's video segments from September 4 on whether the chip supercycle is here to stay and chip suppliers turning bullish on the AI buildout, plus Yahoo Finance's report of Intel climbing as chip stocks shrugged off rising rate-hike odds while NVIDIA and AMD moved higher. The idea reads this as a leadership rotation into hardware and AI infrastructure, and the tape largely cooperated. The fundamentals back the strongest gainers. Lam Research's fiscal year ended June 28, 2026 shows revenue of $23.2B up 26.0% year over year, a 50.5% gross margin, a 35.3% operating margin, and a 58.3% return on equity — numbers…

TSLA Debt to equityDebt to equity trend from CommonQuant fundamentals/XBRL data; -4383.3% from first to latest point.
MeasureValue
2010-12-310.34691472508790233 ratio
2011-06-300.3850659488250892 ratio
2011-09-300.7649990820011017 ratio
2011-12-311.197683501082372 ratio
2012-03-312.211699182447977 ratio
2012-06-306.367515872378044 ratio
2012-09-30-14.85944394618834 ratio
Latest Value-14.85944394618834 ratio
Change Pct-4383.3131232533315 ratio
TickerTSLA
Timeframereported periods
AAPL sector percentile checkRanks AAPL against 804 companies in its sector using CommonQuant fundamentals.
MeasureValue
Free cash flow99.37810945273633th percentile
Operating margin96.42445213379467th percentile
Rnd Intensity27.116212338593975th percentile
Revenue growth (YoY)44.50063211125158th percentile
TickerAAPL
SectorInformation Technology
Peer Count804
ACN sector percentile checkRanks ACN against 804 companies in its sector using CommonQuant fundamentals.
MeasureValue
Free cash flow98.75621890547264th percentile
Operating margin78.31603229527106th percentile
Revenue growth (YoY)25.663716814159297th percentile
Gross margin27.927927927927925th percentile
TickerACN
SectorInformation Technology
Peer Count804

Scores

  • Conviction score breakdown: 54
  • Thesis support: 65
  • Trade readiness: 40
  • Risk quality: 55
  • Backtest evidence: 35
  • Fundamentals trend: 75

Watch items

  • LRCX — RSI (14)
  • LRCX — Close vs EMA (21)
  • LRCX — ADX (14)
  • LRCX — Support level (rank 2)
  • LRCX — Resistance level (rank 1)
  • LRCX — Insider net open-market value
Unlock full analysis

Key details

AAPLACNADBEAMDINTCJDLRCXMSFTORCLTSLA1h#canonical-demand#cluster-version:1#direction:neutral#entity-kind:instrument#entity:AAPL#entity:ACN#entity:ADBE#entity:AMD#entity:INTC#entity:JD#entity:LRCX#entity:MSFT#entity:ORCL#entity:TSLA#horizon:short_term#intent:research#symbol:AAPL#symbol:ACN#symbol:ADBE#symbol:AMD#symbol:INTC#symbol:JD#symbol:LRCX#symbol:MSFT#symbol:ORCL#symbol:TSLA

Community

2
Upvotes
0
Views
0
Copies
0
Cosigns

News sources

Related ideas

Related

Loading…