# Bank of America's warning that deal-making fees will fall over 10% is an early earnings signal that Wall Street activity is cooling, and the stock is already sliding on the news. This lands right before a Fed meeting where a rate hike is essentially locke

_AI-generated trading idea · BEARISH · BAC, GS, MS_

> Canonical page: https://commonquant.ai/research/for-you/bank-of-america-s-warning-that-deal-making-fees-will-fall-ov--b0d96717-ad8b-4c2c-8da7-e2de96360e86

Bank of America's warning that deal-making fees will fall over 10% is an early earnings signal that Wall Street activity is cooling, and the stock is already sliding on the news. This lands right before a Fed meeting where a rate hike is essentially locked in, and one of the market's best-known bond watchers says the yield selloff toward and beyond 5% isn't over. Higher borrowing costs and a further jump in yields directly suppress the IPOs, mergers, and bond issuance that banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley get paid for. The combination of a fresh profit warning and a hawkish macro backdrop gives banks with big deal-making businesses a reason to underperform the broader market.

## Idea

Bank of America's warning that deal-making fees will fall over 10% is an early earnings signal that Wall Street activity is cooling, and the stock is already sliding on the news. This lands right before a Fed meeting where a rate hike is essentially locked in, and one of the market's best-known bond watchers says the yield selloff toward and beyond 5% isn't over. Higher borrowing costs and a further jump in yields directly suppress the IPOs, mergers, and bond issuance that banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley get paid for. The combination of a fresh profit warning and a hawkish macro backdrop gives banks with big deal-making businesses a reason to underperform the broader market.

## Advanced Analysis

### Verdict: The fee warning is real, but this setup is a long-only system still waiting on its entry

The idea's macro logic is coherent: BAC's September 14 warning that third-quarter deal fees will fall more than 10% (per CNBC), a Fed hike effectively locked in (per Reuters), and a yield push toward 5% (per Bloomberg) all press a lever on the IPO, M&A and bond issuance revenue that GS and MS depend on most. But there is a structural mismatch: the supplied rule set is long-only, and none of the three entries is live — BAC at $59.47 sits $1.77 below its $61.24 EMA with ADX at 37.7 versus a required sub-30, GS is $42.92 under its $1,031.37 EMA, and MS at $206.58 needs a $6.81 reclaim with ADX at 49.9. That matters because the completed nine-month test returned just 4.0% across five trades with a 40% win rate and a 9.2% worst drawdown — a long-side system, not evidence that shorting these banks profits from a fee recession. The fundamentals also push back: all three posted strong 2025 results (BAC net income of $30.5B on a 27% margin, GS 13.7% ROE, MS 15.1% ROE), and each raised its dividend — GS by 38.5% to $14 annually. Insider filings for the June 30, 2026 period show net open-market selling at all three (about $29.3M at GS, $8.9M at MS, $6.7M at BAC), a modest bearish lean that predates the warning and is only weak corroboration. The verdict: the thesis is plausible, the tradable vehicle is not ready, so wait.

#### Conviction score breakdown

Composite score computed by the server from the applicable evidence-tier dimensions.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| Thesis support | 65/100 |
| Trade readiness | 20/100 |
| Risk quality | 55/100 |
| Backtest evidence | 35/100 |
| Fundamentals trend | 50/100 |
| Score | 45/100 |
| Composite Score | 45/100 |
| Evidence Tier | backtested |

#### Decision scenarios

Bull, base, and bear cases synthesized from the cited evidence tier. Likelihoods are rounded evidence-weighted judgments, not statistically calibrated forecasts.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| Evidence Tier | backtested |

### Trade now: all three bank entries are waiting — GS is closest

The idea is bearish on the dealer banks, but the tradable rule set is long-only and it is currently waiting. On BAC, the close is $59.47 versus a 50-day EMA of $61.24, so price sits $1.77 below the level the entry requires; RSI (14) is 23.5, already under the 50 cross level, and ADX (14) is 37.7 versus a required reading below 30. GS is closest: at $988.45 it is $42.92 under its EMA of $1,031.37, RSI is 32.0, and ADX at 26.5 already satisfies its condition — but price must reclaim the EMA and RSI must make a fresh cross below 50 before anything triggers. MS at $206.58 needs a $6.81 move above its $213.39 EMA, with RSI at 30.6 and ADX at a trend-heavy 49.9 still far from its threshold.

What "wait" means concretely: no entry is live on any of the three names today. For GS the fastest path is a daily close back above $1,031 with a fresh RSI cross under 50 while ADX stays below 30. For BAC and MS, both the EMA reclaim and an ADX drop below 30 are needed, which typically requires the current selloff to cool rather than extend.

Risk is defined up front if an entry fills: each position carries a 2.4% stop loss and a 4.8% take profit, roughly 2-to-1 reward-to-risk, with positions capped at 25% of the book. The completed nine-month test on BAC produced a 4.0% return across 5 trades with a 40% win rate and a 9.2% maximum drawdown, so the drawdown budget you are signing up for is single-digit, not double-digit. No robust alternative parameter setup was established, so the published rules are used as-is.

One action point before the Fed meeting: the thesis's catalyst is a hawkish hike plus a yield push toward and beyond 5% suppressing deal-making activity, per the idea itself. If yields keep climbing, the selloff could extend — which paradoxically keeps all three tickers below their EMA entry levels and the strategy flat. Patience is the position until GS first, then BAC and MS, satisfy their conditions.

#### BAC price and trigger map

Uses the idea timeframe and keeps price levels on the price axis.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| Ticker | BAC |
| Timeframe | 1d |

#### GS price and trigger map

Uses the idea timeframe and keeps price levels on the price axis.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| Ticker | GS |
| Timeframe | 1d |

#### MS price and trigger map

Uses the idea timeframe and keeps price levels on the price axis.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| Ticker | MS |
| Timeframe | 1d |

### A Profit Warning From the Biggest Bank Is a Leading Indicator — and the Macro Just Turned

The idea's core signal is straightforward: per the CNBC piece on September 14, 2026, Bank of America told the market that third-quarter investment banking fees will fall more than 10%, and BAC shares slid on the news. Bank of America is the largest of the three names here — $3.41 trillion in total assets and $113.1 billion of fiscal 2025 revenue — so when the sector's biggest retail and commercial franchise flags a double-digit drop in deal fees, it is a demand read for the whole investment banking complex, including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, whose fee pools are a larger share of their revenue base.

The macro timing reinforces the thesis. Per Reuters, a Fed rate hike — the first under the new chair — is effectively set, and per the Bloomberg piece, the strategist who correctly called 10-year Treasuries at 5% says the yield selloff isn't over. Rising discount rates and 5%+ risk-free yields directly suppress IPOs, M&A, and bond issuance — precisely the businesses the idea targets.

The fundamentals back the idea's weakest point: cash quality at Goldman. GS reported negative free cash flow of $47.2 billion for fiscal 2025, sitting at the 0.5th percentile among 877 financial-sector peers — a reminder that reported earnings at these banks are financing-sensitive and deteriorate quickly when activity dries up. Morgan Stanley's own most recent quarter shows mild cooling: return on equity edged down to 4.80% from 4.87% quarter over quarter, with shares outstanding shrinking to 1.572 billion, a buyback-funded cushion that cannot offset a fee recession indefinitely.

On the supplied completed backtest over the past 9 months, the rule-based setup traded 5 times, won 40% of trades, and returned 4.0% with a worst drawdown of 9.2%. The strategy's 4.8% take-profit and 2.4% stop structure is consistent with a thesis that expects these names to grind lower, not crash — the right profile for a macro-driven underperformance call rather than a directional bet on a single bank's blowup.

#### BAC Return on equity

Return on equity trend from CommonQuant fundamentals/XBRL data; -86.9% from first to latest point.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| 2007-12-31 | \0.10205513511304266% |
| 2008-06-30 | \0.020959979347351727% |
| 2008-09-30 | \0.0073087885543253505% |
| 2008-12-31 | \0.02263741725594741% |
| 2009-03-31 | \0.017729149359838697% |
| 2009-06-30 | \0.012635605443030036% |
| 2009-09-30 | \-0.0038846179220204673% |
| 2009-12-31 | \0.027116710737802665% |
| 2010-03-31 | \0.013845437575873608% |
| 2010-06-30 | \0.01339343151466287% |
| Latest Value | \0.01339343151466287% |
| Change Pct | \-86.87627869011445% |
| Ticker | BAC |
| Timeframe | reported periods |

#### GS Return on equity

Return on equity trend from CommonQuant fundamentals/XBRL data; -86.1% from first to latest point.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| 2007-11-30 | \0.27100467289719626% |
| 2008-11-28 | \0.03607326508101726% |
| 2008-11-30 | \0.03607326508101726% |
| 2008-12-26 | \-0.0121176342649412% |
| 2009-06-26 | \0.05468613185168675% |
| 2009-09-25 | \0.04878048780487805% |
| 2009-12-31 | \0.18928359306502252% |
| 2010-03-31 | \0.04737881114279448% |
| 2010-06-30 | \0.008304095151654723% |
| 2010-09-30 | \0.025086905375576615% |
| 2010-12-31 | \0.1079942085940328% |
| 2011-03-31 | \0.03774027515213402% |
| Latest Value | \0.03774027515213402% |
| Change Pct | \-86.07393933518979% |
| Ticker | GS |
| Timeframe | reported periods |

#### BAC sector percentile check

Ranks BAC against 618 companies in its sector using CommonQuant fundamentals.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | \95.79288025889969th percentile |
| Return on equity | \68.05399325084365th percentile |
| Ticker | BAC |
| Sector | Financials |
| Peer Count | 618 |

### Strong Returns, Rising Dividends, and Sellers Who Aren't Panicking: The Bear Case's Problems

Start with what the numbers say is working. All three banks posted solid fiscal 2025 results: BAC net income of $30.5 billion on a 27% net margin with diluted EPS of $3.81 (up 4.0% year over year),…

#### Backtested stress-test read

Shows the backtested sample behind the bear-case risk discussion.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| Return | \4.031538595489848% |
| Win rate | 40% |
| Max drawdown | \9.23816330903537% |
| Trades | 5 count |
| Timeframe | 9 months |

#### BAC Return on equity

Return on equity trend from CommonQuant fundamentals/XBRL data; -86.9% from first to latest point.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| 2007-12-31 | \0.10205513511304266% |
| 2008-06-30 | \0.020959979347351727% |
| 2008-09-30 | \0.0073087885543253505% |
| 2008-12-31 | \0.02263741725594741% |
| 2009-03-31 | \0.017729149359838697% |
| 2009-06-30 | \0.012635605443030036% |
| 2009-09-30 | \-0.0038846179220204673% |
| 2009-12-31 | \0.027116710737802665% |
| 2010-03-31 | \0.013845437575873608% |
| 2010-06-30 | \0.01339343151466287% |
| Latest Value | \0.01339343151466287% |
| Change Pct | \-86.87627869011445% |
| Ticker | BAC |
| Timeframe | reported periods |

#### GS Return on equity

Return on equity trend from CommonQuant fundamentals/XBRL data; -86.1% from first to latest point.

| Measure | Value |
| --- | ---: |
| 2007-11-30 | \0.27100467289719626% |
| 2008-11-28 | \0.03607326508101726% |
| 2008-11-30 | \0.03607326508101726% |
| 2008-12-26 | \-0.0121176342649412% |
| 2009-06-26 | \0.05468613185168675% |
| 2009-09-25 | \0.04878048780487805% |
| 2009-12-31 | \0.18928359306502252% |
| 2010-03-31 | \0.04737881114279448% |
| 2010-06-30 | \0.008304095151654723% |
| 2010-09-30 | \0.025086905375576615% |
| 2010-12-31 | \0.1079942085940328% |
| 2011-03-31 | \0.03774027515213402% |
| Latest Value | \0.03774027515213402% |
| Change Pct | \-86.07393933518979% |
| Ticker | GS |
| Timeframe | reported periods |

### Scores

- **Conviction score breakdown:** 45
- **Thesis support:** 65
- **Trade readiness:** 20
- **Risk quality:** 55
- **Backtest evidence:** 35
- **Fundamentals trend:** 50

### Watch items

- **GS — GS close vs 50-day EMA**
- **GS — GS ADX (14)**
- **BAC — BAC RSI (14) fresh cross below 50**
- **BAC — BAC ADX (14)**
- **MS — MS close vs 50-day EMA**
- **MS — MS ADX (14)**
- **GS — GS earnings guidance on deal-making fees**
- **BAC — Next insider ownership filing after 2026-06-30**

## Key details

- Symbols: BAC, GS, MS
- Timeframes: 1d
- Tags: \#canonical-demand, \#cluster-version:1, \#direction:bearish, \#entity-kind:instrument, \#entity:BAC, \#entity:GS, \#entity:MS, \#horizon:unspecified, \#intent:research, \#symbol:BAC, \#symbol:GS, \#symbol:MS

## Community

- Upvotes: 0
- Views: 0
- Copies: 0
- Cosigns: 0

## News sources

- [Bank of America expects third-quarter investment banking fees to fall more than 10%; shares slide](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/14/bank-of-america-bac-q3-investment-banking-fees.html) — CNBC
- [Fed's table is set for a rate hike, a first under Warsh - Reuters](https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMilAFBVV95cUxOTmR4eUlzVVZXLUFSSEpiLUs3UkxJMDYwVVpsU2o1REJIOUFSTlN3U2VBV2NRZ3hUTUNzSy1KRTNlODFaTmh6bGgtTFpCM3BCWE13c250dlBDTW5XaS1rWHpUMjV0cFJiSkxqN3g4OTVVZmJKN1dKSXZhRHZ2bW1Lbndrc3UxRGhjNG9LY01lZklaajE4?oc=5) — Reuters
- [Strategist Who Foresaw 10-Year Treasuries at 5% Says Selloff Isn’t Done Yet](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-09-14/strategist-who-foresaw-10-year-treasuries-at-5-says-selloff-isn-t-done-yet) — Bloomberg
- [The Fed is likely to raise interest rates as inflation persists. What that means for consumers](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/14/fed-rate-hike-anticipated-what-it-means-for-your-money.html) — CNBC

## Related

- [BAC trade ideas](https://commonquant.ai/stocks/bac)
- [GS trade ideas](https://commonquant.ai/stocks/gs)
- [MS trade ideas](https://commonquant.ai/stocks/ms)
- [Latest market news](https://commonquant.ai/news)

## About CommonQuant Research

Ideas and Advanced Analysis are generated with fresh, LLM-selected news headlines and grounded in SEC XBRL fundamentals and peer percentiles. Strategies built from these ideas are automatically backtested (12-month and 5-year, walk-forward tuned) and stress-tested before they can go live, then monitored against the news hourly while they run.